Wove is built from the ground up with LLM-native intelligence, real-time configurability, and a modern user experience. Raft? It's powerful, but built for a world of static templates and rigid workflows. Here's how we compare.
Feature | ![]() | ![]() |
---|---|---|
Foundation | Built on modern LLMs | Classical ML and templates |
Document Extraction | High-accuracy, generalizable, few-shot adaptable | Needs pre-defined templates or retraining |
Email Copilot | Fully integrated, understands natural language RFQs | No email-native UI |
CargoWise Integration | Modular, editable by users in seconds | Static, changes take weeks |
Custom Field Mapping | Fully user-controlled | Requires engineering |
Adaptability to New Formats | Instant via LLM and user feedback | Manual retraining or config updates |
Deployment Speed | Live in days | Live in weeks/months |
UX & Workflow | Copilot overlay + API-first | Back-office dashboard style |
Use Case Fit | RFQs, quoting, reconciliation, pre-clearance packets | Invoice automation, customs, ops flows |
Ideal Customer | Fast-scaling forwarders, 3PLs | Large enterprises with static workflows |
Wove's model can generalize across unstructured emails, PDFs, spreadsheets, and images without retraining. Raft often requires templates or labeled training data per document type.
Wove embeds into Outlook/Gmail, helping teams extract, structure, and act on info directly from the inbox. Raft only works inside its own UI.
Wove's CargoWise module lets users instantly add, remove, or remap fields—without waiting on engineering or vendor timelines. With Raft, even small changes can take weeks.
In logistics, formats change weekly. Wove's few-shot LLM architecture adjusts instantly. Raft's setup works best when things stay the same.
Your business moves fast. Your automation should too. Schedule a demo to see why freight forwarders, NVOCCs, and 3PLs are switching to Wove.